<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sushi Ran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fastfoodiecooks.com/2009/05/04/sushi-ran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fastfoodiecooks.com/2009/05/04/sushi-ran/</link>
	<description>real food recipes, healthy cooking, gourmet eating.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:09:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: dcros24</title>
		<link>http://fastfoodiecooks.com/2009/05/04/sushi-ran/comment-page-1/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>dcros24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 22:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastfoodiecooks.com/?p=480#comment-941</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the question Mike. 
Sushi Ran is head and shoulders above Kisaku. In my visits (yes, I admit it, I ended up going back to Kisaku a number of times) to Kisaku I never found it to be anything but moderately good sushi. Sushi Ran had me swooning, the kind of place that makes you say: this is what good sushi should taste like as well as wow, I would have never expected that flavor combination. In the head to head comparison of unagi sashimi at each place, they were comparable. Kisaku does use quality fish. But in the creativity of the rolls and for the much more extensive selection of seasonal/available fish selection, Sushi Ran runs away with it. Within the Seattle area, I haven&#039;t found a sushi restaurant that would be comparable to Sushi Ran (though in the bay area, Domo is quite comparable) unfortunately. Maybe when I am back home to Seattle, I will spend a month going to every sushi restaurant in town to find out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the question Mike.<br />
Sushi Ran is head and shoulders above Kisaku. In my visits (yes, I admit it, I ended up going back to Kisaku a number of times) to Kisaku I never found it to be anything but moderately good sushi. Sushi Ran had me swooning, the kind of place that makes you say: this is what good sushi should taste like as well as wow, I would have never expected that flavor combination. In the head to head comparison of unagi sashimi at each place, they were comparable. Kisaku does use quality fish. But in the creativity of the rolls and for the much more extensive selection of seasonal/available fish selection, Sushi Ran runs away with it. Within the Seattle area, I haven&#039;t found a sushi restaurant that would be comparable to Sushi Ran (though in the bay area, Domo is quite comparable) unfortunately. Maybe when I am back home to Seattle, I will spend a month going to every sushi restaurant in town to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://fastfoodiecooks.com/2009/05/04/sushi-ran/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 22:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastfoodiecooks.com/?p=480#comment-940</guid>
		<description>How does Sushi Ran compare to Kisaku? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does Sushi Ran compare to Kisaku?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
